Notices built from real reasons
Adverse-action and decline reasons come from the conditions that failed, so the notice matches the decision.
Consumer and small-business credit, limit changes and KYC refreshes, each recorded with the evidence used, the policy that applied and the approvals required, so adverse-action notices and examiner questions have a real answer.
Start in a private sandbox with synthetic or approved sample data, using the shared foundation for one real decision, and shape the industry pack with us as it's built. Builds on the commercial lending pack, which is available today.
Retail and small-business credit teams, credit committees, KYC and onboarding teams, and fair lending and compliance reviewers.
AI helps score applications and prepare files, and reviewers check the output. But reason codes are written after the fact, guarantor and beneficial-owner checks sit in separate tools, and committee approvals live in minutes or email. Proving that protected attributes played no part is a manual exercise.
Each decision records the ratios computed from verified statements, every guarantor and owner checked, and the committee quorum that approved it. Adverse-action notices are built from the policy conditions that actually failed, never from a written-after narrative.
Adverse-action and decline reasons come from the conditions that failed, so the notice matches the decision.
Approvals above a limit require the right quorum, and each member's authority is checked.
Show which inputs a decision used, and that protected attributes were not among them.
Refresh decisions see every owner and guarantor, with stale documents flagged before approval.
A synthetic example of the planned workflow.
Two years of statements, the bureau report and the beneficial-ownership certification are matched to the business and its two owners.
Coverage and leverage are calculated from verified statements, with each figure linked to its source.
The requested limit is above the branch's authority, so the decision goes to the credit committee.
Two members with the required authority approve; their authority is checked at sign-off.
If the request had been declined, the notice would list the exact conditions that failed.
Design partners set these baselines on their current process, so the improvement can be measured when the pack is ready.
KrisVen provides governance infrastructure that supports these expectations. Determining and attesting to compliance remains the responsibility of the deploying organization and its counsel.
KrisVen will connect to the systems your teams already use and record the decisions made with them. It doesn't replace them.
Design partners start now on the shared foundation with one real decision, and get early access as the industry pack is completed.